Titelaufnahme

Titel
Schumpeter's split between "pure" economics and institutional economics : why methodological individualism was not fully considered
VerfasserBögenhold, Dieter
Erschienen in
International Advances in Economic Research, Edwardsville, Ill. ; Berlin ; Heidelberg, 2018, Jg. 2018, H. 24, S. 253-264
ErschienenEdwardsville, Ill. : Springer, 2018
SpracheEnglisch
DokumenttypAufsatz in einer Zeitschrift
Schlagwörter (DE)Methodological individualism / Institutional economics / Joseph A. Schumpeter / Economic methodology
URNurn:nbn:at:at-ubk:3-103 Persistent Identifier (URN)
DOI10.1007/s11294-018-9702-z 
Zugriffsbeschränkung
 Das Werk ist frei verfügbar
Dateien
Schumpeter's split between "pure" economics and institutional economics [0.31 mb]
Links
Nachweis
Klassifikation
Zusammenfassung (Englisch)

While Joseph A. Schumpeter is classified as a pioneer of evolutionary economics in a wide sense and of entrepreneurship and innovation management in a narrower sense, Schumpeter is less known for his contributions in the area of scientific methodology and history of science. The paper deals with methodological premises in Schumpeter's scientific positioning. In 1908, in his Das Wesen und der Hauptinhalt der theoretischen Nationalökonomie,Schumpeter developed and pioneered his methodological individualism which is very much acknowledged. However, comparing these early positions with methodological writings in his History of Economic Analysis(1954) shows that he has not really shifted from methodological individualism to an institutional perspective that addresses the academic interplay and sees economic action rooted in historical predispositions, paths and social constraints.

Notiz
Statistik
Das PDF-Dokument wurde 6 mal heruntergeladen.
Lizenz
CC-BY-Lizenz (4.0)Creative Commons Namensnennung 4.0 International Lizenz